Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top boybands of all time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 21:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Top boybands of all time
Top boybands of all time God. Another list. And just like the other music based lists, this one is almost impossible to quantify. Please kill it. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 11:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Listcruft.  Movementarian 12:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 12:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Beyond just being listcruft an article created by wikipedians that categorizes anything as being "The Top" is unavoidably POV &mdash; Falerin&lt;talk&gt;,&lt;contrib&gt; 14:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft. Eusebeus 14:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete inherently POV non-maintainable listcruft. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as the POV cannot be removed without rewriting the entire article and changing the title --jackohare 16:39, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easy to verify. -- JJay 17:39, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. &mdash;Preost talk  contribs  18:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete violates NPOV and is listcruft.Gateman1997 18:47, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge if possible into List of best-selling music artists - Rudykog 20:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What quantifies "top"? Who decides what a "boyband" is? (ESkog)(Talk) 20:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. User:50cent4 keeps coming up with terribly POV edits, and this is just another example. This sort of stuff needs to be stopped to show them that we really do beleive in WP:NPOV. Harro5 23:24, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all boy bands from every human's memory. And also this article for useless listing. Croat Canuck 05:22, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.