Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topaz (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD. ✗ plicit  11:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Topaz (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sources fail to demonstrate pass of WP:GNG or WP:NCOMP nearlyevil  665  06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  06:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

nearlyevil 665  06:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Also possible UPE. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom can't see any reliable coverage. Sanketio31 (talk) 11:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

*Keep I added some significant sources. It's definitely not a UPE created article as it's an article about a defunct plant in occupied by Russia-backed terrorists Donetsk. It's a part of military history of Soviet Union, Ukraine and Europe, as Topaz was producing the famous Kolchuga passive sensor. This plant is also a part of modern Russo-Ukrainian war as it was blatantly seized and moved to Russia. That's why I decided to shed a light upon this subject and ask you not to consider this translated from Ukrainian wikipedia page as a page about a private for-profit company, but mere a part of a military history of Europe. --Sharky tale (talk) 09:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC) stuck sockpuppet-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 05:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC) nearlyevil 665  10:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for adding the sources. Unfortunately, they still qualify as run-off-the-mill and trivial mentions of the plant. I would suggest a possible merge with Kolchuga passive sensor.
 * merging is also a nice decision as the plant is quite notable and the information should be kept. thanks for your comment. --Sharky tale (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC) stuck sockpuppet-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 05:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * however, the article about Kolchuga passive sensor is not much better sourced. So, it will be a stragne decision to merge the article about the plant to the article about it's product. It's like to merge Apple to iPhone. --Sharky tale (talk) 07:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC) stuck sockpuppet-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 05:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Appears to be notable and well-sourced enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you seen the source assessment table? Could you kindly point out which references you think are qualifying - I'd add them to the table. nearlyevil  665  15:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge with Kolchuga passive sensor as WP:ATD.  HighKing++
 * Speedy Delete G5 (noticed the AfD as I was about to tag). Created by a sockpuppet of Bodiadub and all substantial edits are by sockpuppets (creator + ). The topic is borderline notable, and there is an issue of UPE here. WP:DENY.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 05:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.