Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topcliffe Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Topcliffe Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Primary school. Appears to be non-notable. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Primary schools are not inherently notable (there are almost 17,000 in UK). This article fails to state why this school in particular is notable.Pit-yacker (talk) 21:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The topic is notable per the WP:GNG being covered in detail in independent, reliable sources such as this. Our editing policy is not to delete such notable topics. Warden (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage. Run-of-the-mill. A routine government report, as as that linked above, does not establish "significant coverage." Neutralitytalk 23:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article would require significantly more sourcing to claim notability sufficient to meet the GNG. The content that is vaguely notable is already covered at Castle Vale - I'd argue that that's sufficient coverage (it's more about the tower block redevelopment anyway than it is the school) and that an article about the school is simply duplication. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Castle Vale  per standard procedure. Non   notable schools are generally  not  deleted; instead,  as demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures, they are redirected to  the article about  the school district (USA) or to  the article about  the locality (rest  of the world). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the  on  the redirect  page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable.Fails GNG. Redirect might be preferred if it was enshrined in a guideline or policy. But it's not unfortunately. It's just custom and practice that's grown up that is unsupported by anything official. Let's delete and move on. Might encourage acceptance of a decent notability guideline for schools.Fmph (talk) 10:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.