Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topless Sun Tanning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Non admin closure. The result was redirect. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Topless Sun Tanning

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability. Subject matter is already covered in suntanning and other articles and there isn't sufficient information to justify a seperate article. Pharmboy (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Current article seems to be purely original research as well. Pharmboy (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * delete If this is already covered, it should be deleted or possibly merged. cf38 talk  22:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks any notability. Not really deserving of its own article. Scar ian  Talk  22:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - should be merged into suntanning. Andareed (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Article merger does not involve deletion at any stage. Uncle G (talk) 23:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the full color illustration was a nice touch, but this is not encyclopedic. The title kind of says it all. Mandsford (talk) 22:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect To Suntanning or Toplessness Much though I like the illustration, this isn't really needed here. Covered already elsewhere, this can only result in a duplication of info. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 23:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Suntanning. As for the picture, I wonder if the person who submitted it obtained model releases from the females shown topless? Though it is not grounds for deletion I note the presence of such high quality writing as "Some woman want to attract a mate by showing off they're breats." Edison (talk) 23:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic poorly written original research with no sources and a subject that in itself, independently appears to fail WP:N. Redirecting to suntanning would also be acceptable. Nice bit of WikiPorn there in the image used... or not.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 03:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect To Suntanning or Toplessness The article provide little context and fewer sources. Besides, better pictures could have been added. Alansohn (talk) 08:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The picture illustrating it would seem hard to improve on, but of course additional examples would be helpful for those having trouble mastering the concept. Edison (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Better angles and additional images would be helpful for those trying to better master the concept. While in general a picture is worth a thousand words, here it could save somebody a few dollars. Alansohn (talk) 17:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)