Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 08:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Topline

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Dance-related article by an SPA that seems to be original research. I would normally suggest merging it to Ballroom dance, but nowhere is the term mentioned in that article.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 04:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 
 * I just added Topline Dance Frame to the nomination (an article created by the same editor), which seems to be nothing more than advertising and of which I could not find significant coverage.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 04:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for both articles as per nom... these are advertisements. --DeVerm (talk) 04:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line 06:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for both articles as per nom. Pure SPAM. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.