Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toplist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Toplist

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. I am unable to locate reliable sources to substantiate this article. JBsupreme ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 07:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find anything that would confer notability. I see the term being used (very scantly -- only a few hits on GNews), but I don't find anything resembling coverage of the term/concept itself, let alone non-trivial coverage. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  07:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Provisional Keep - currently being considered for redirect/merge at Articles for deletion/Topsite (www), which seems to be another term for the same concept -- Boing!   said Zebedee  09:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ginsengbomb. The discussion that User:Boing! said Zebedee has linked to should probably follow suit, I don't see the advantage to redirecting one problematic article to another when neither one have the requisite non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. RFerreira (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Entirely notable and encyclopaedic subject.  I'll see if I can't add some sources.  Heather (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I'll change to keep if you succeed -- my personal bias is that this should be a Wikipedia article, I just couldn't find any usable sources! ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  07:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. On that very same note, I will happily withdraw this nomination if some non-trivial sources of an encyclopedic nature can be located.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 05:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. A google books search for this term found no usable refs for this meaning. Pcap  ping  13:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Looking at the article's history, it has been pared down to one line. Unless it is expanded and suitably referenced, it is not going to survive this discussion in which time is ticking on it.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 02:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.