Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torchwood: Original Television Soundtrack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 08:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Torchwood: Original Television Soundtrack

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There are no reliable third-party sources to establish this page's notability. The user who added the Amazon reference was well-intentioned, but retailers' websites do not qualify as reliable third-party sources. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► duumvirate ─╢ 17:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable soundtrack release. treelo  radda  14:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It contains when each tracks are included in an episode, making it a useful resource. 86.139.225.200 (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And in what way does it meet our content criteria? Or do you just like the page? ╟─ Treasury Tag ► stannary parliament ─╢ 17:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Considering treelo has put this up for deletion the same day I use the equality arguement, it makes it even more notable than before. As ever, full of crap to filter information, instead of being neutral. 86.139.225.200 (talk) 23:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry? If you noticed, this specific AfD was done several days before mine which I withdrew because this already exists but not on the back of your argument at all. It's equality in that both articles aren't any more notable than each other but I'm not sure how that makes either more notable. Also, cut it back with the personal attacks, nobody has insulted you so no need to insult anyone else. treelo  radda  00:00, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10th July was yesterday. Why don't you stop trying to curtail an information resource? You probably won't answer the question again though as you're too high and mighty. 86.139.141.144 (talk) 10:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge with Torchwood article. magnius (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There are plenty of reviews on the net by professional reviewers; notability has been established, but needs to be incorporated in the article. — Edokter  •  Talk  • 12:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Edokter's list establishes notability. Rlendog (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.