Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torgoen Swiss (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Torgoen Swiss
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously nominated for deletion by someone else, but closed for lack of input. No in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources - just some passing mentions and press releases. I suspect the article creator has COI. Citobun (talk) 15:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- a non-notable brand. Mostly trivial coverage: all I see are blogs, press releases and adverts. Sources discussed at the last AfD are insufficient to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH> K.e.coffman (talk) 18:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. the sources are the sort of promotional mentions to be expected. This was aa draft the contributor moved themselves from Draft space; the various diverse articles on small companies from this contributor all need to be examined. DGG ( talk ) 13:48, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Press releases, trivial quotation by the founder in one article, and advertisements. Significant coverage in reliable sources is lacking. I agree this brand is not notable. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as this is frankly speedy material, consisting only of PR. SwisterTwister   talk  23:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.