Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toringdon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Toringdon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

So this is a "mixed-use" development--the article doesn't clearly tell you, but it's in Charlotte, NC, in the US, which is why almost all the references are from the Charlotte Business Journal, and that's of course the problem. This project, the article for which at times looks like a real estate listing, has not gotten significant discussion in the national or supra-regional press. There's stuff like this, but that, like the CBJ articles, is half-press release and less-than-half journalistic coverage. So I do not believe this to be notable via the GNG, and there is of course no inherent notability for a thing like this. Drmies (talk) 16:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable outside of local press and press releases Dexxtrall (talk) 18:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Found a couple of PR, maybe borderline notability. Slovenichibo (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom.4meter4 (talk) 05:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.