Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tormar Associates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Tormar Associates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:CORP. There's a bit of coverage about a recent lawsuit but that's it. Neil N  talk to me 21:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; see also John Tormondsen. 2602:302:D88:CFA9:BC9E:B1CF:D269:DFFB (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Article has been updated to meet WP:CORP. Added reference to New York Times study indicating that each Tormar partner owned a significant portion of Goldman Sachs (over $107M each) at time of IPO, as well as reference to New York Times article about partner's departure from Goldman Sachs, as well as feature story in Institutional Investor's Alpha about his next project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BradYard (talk • contribs)
 * See WP:NOTINHERIT. --Neil N  talk to me 19:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks significant coverage. Not suitable for an encyclopedia article. --Michig (talk) 08:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP, insufficient sources. - Mailer Diablo 23:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.