Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto Metropolitan University's Student Learning Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 21:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Toronto Metropolitan University's Student Learning Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Multiply draftified and blodged back into mainspace, this insanely long and detailed article about a student learning centre fails to demonstrate a pass of WP:GNG on any grounds, cites no RS-based SIGCOV and fails WP:NORG (although we are not to depend on SCHOOLOUTCOMES, one does note that "Faculties, departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable". This one is most certainly not to be considered notable. Redirect to Toronto Metropolitan University as an ATD or, simpler, delete as it is already covered in that article and the likelihood of anyone choosing to search for this institution as a standalone is very, very remote. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Canada. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The references seem to establish that this is an architecturally notable building. Coverage in Canadian Architect magazine, Building and all the other sources that are not internal Toronto Metropolitan University pages adds are enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Even if a subunit of a university is not always notable, it passes notability as a building. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's won multiple awards for its design, and has received RS coverage for accessibility issues. Not notable as a university sub-unit, but notable as a building. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.