Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto Rent Bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Rent bank. redirected rather then merged as merge material may be sourced but the history is all there so if the new sources for rent bank allow some thi this to be merged help yourselves Spartaz Humbug! 04:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Toronto Rent Bank

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about an organisation that has no coverage in reliable sources. A Google News search shows only one result which is a United Way press release. As such, this organisation fails to meet notability guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @302  · 06:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete While I sympathize with the aims of this organization, there is a lack of coverage to confer notablility according to WP standards. Angryapathy (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I added a reference from Hi-Rise Community Newsletter, which is not indexed by Google News. http://www.hi-risenews.com/show.php?page=./issues/2009-08/0908Tenants.txt - Eastmain (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Rent bank. As far as I can tell, the rent bank program is unique to Ontario, so it's not unreasonable to have the rent bank article cover the whole province. There are sufficient reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of the provincial program, of which the Toronto Rent Bank is one part, e.g., , , , , . Pburka (talk) 17:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Sourcing and content improvements needed, but a merge seems reasonable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.