Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto notes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:53, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Toronto notes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I put this up as a PROD which was contested by the author. I continue to believe it should be deleted. As I said in the PROD: Previously deleted as CSD at Toronto Notes and recreated here by the same user. Appears to still fail WP:GNG; there is no evidence of significant independent coverage of this publication. The one independent reference is a passing reference in a YouTube video that this is a study guide; that is not a significant reliable source of notability. Delete. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Everything I found was either OR - frequently under "Essential Med Notes", which seem to be Toronto Notes with a formal cover; mentions on things like the website or unreliable sources. If not delete, then would logically make more sense to merge under MCCQE (which itself doesn't meet notability with given refs, but could) or one of the other exams. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - The original speedy deletion was right on the mark. Spectacularly fails WP:GNG. -- Scjessey (talk) 13:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.