Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TorrentUs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

TorrentUs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a non-notable bit torrent search engine. Fails WP:WEBCRIT for lack of available reliable sources independent of the subject. Most sources merely mention the subject. - MrX 15:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep it has a few mentions on independent websites, and this is enough to keep it. --Frmorrison (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Since when is "a few mentions" an indication of notability?
 * Delete as I found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  01:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   18:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per - Couldn't find anything either, Non notable search engine, Fails GNG .– Davey 2010 Talk 20:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up anything to show the article passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.