Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torry Harris Business Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly   (hot!)  12:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Torry Harris Business Solutions

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-noteable IT middleware implementation company. Was speedied thrice and deleted once through WP:PROD before. Lupo 11:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - only one independent external source (the ChannelTimes news story) is provided, hence no evidence of multiple non-trivial sources to establish notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless further sources are added by the end of this AfD. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  12:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * More Sources added with additional information regarding the company. Deletion of the article has to be reconsidered. Asif m.i 06:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon joe 17:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - sources include the company web page, press releases, a company profile on a client's website and a trade publication. The channel times article is a minor reference but does not establish notability.  Montco 04:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Wait - There seems to be some work being done on the content and on the look out for stronger sources. Should be given more time before being considered for deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Divvy2 (talk • contribs) 09:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC). — Divvy2 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. Minimally sourced article about a non-notable company. Caknuck 08:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.