Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tortience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Xy7  (talk)  00:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Tortience

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NOTDICDEF. Has about 15 ghits, most of which are extracts from the novel which provides the main citation. Cites no reliable sources that demonstrate this is a real archaic word, but does provide a secondary and a tertiary source that assert it, which is why I haven't prodded it. I'd have transwikied it to Wiktionary, but not without proper sources. Ka renjc 19:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdefs, if notable, go in Wiktionary. This is spam for a book. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable, a mere coatrack, no reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable at all.  abf  /talk to me/  19:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.