Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tosha Thakkar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  - After reading the article and the below debate I feel compelled to close this promptly. Peripitus (Talk) 07:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)}}

Tosha Thakkar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject seems to fail WP:NEWSEVENT and WP:BLP1E. Was not notable prior to demise. Circumstances of death don't seem notable either, whether as an example of a particular type of crime or criminal psychology. LordVetinari (talk) 13:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Agree with LordVetinari. This article is fit for deletion. Not an encyclopedic entry. Veryhuman (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously an unfortunate event, but no evidence of notability presented, despite oblique reference to attacks on overseas students.--Grahame (talk) 00:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. The WP:BREAKING section of WP:EVENT recommends waiting to create articles such as these, but it also recommends waiting to nominate them for deletion due to the potential for further developments. The crime has received substantial coverage in India and Australia so I'm going to follow that guideline's recommendation for now, even though it's likely I'll end up agreeing with the nom. Location (talk) 04:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply I nominated it as I doubted there would be notable further developments. The discovery of the crime is no longer breaking news, the arrest of the alleged offender has almost closed the case as far as newspaper headlines are concerned. The crime was not a long-term unsolved mystery. The crime does not appear to be racially motivated (and this raises questions of the relevance of this link). The victim was not notable. The alleged offender was not notable. The crime did not appear to provoke any notable incidents (large-scale protests, war between India and Australia etc). Even though my opinion of the article's notability hasn't changed, I agree with your suggestion, Location, of following the guideline you noted. I hadn't read that section so thank you for bringing it to my attention. LordVetinari (talk) 06:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and per WP:NOT Nick-D (talk) 07:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.