Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toshiyuki Kakuta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Toshiyuki Kakuta

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural. Article has been repeatedly prodded, most recently by User:Bali ultimate, with rationale "long standing unreferenced blp with not even an assetion of notability. Fails MUSIC, CREATIVE, BIO. Part of a walled garden of musicians involved in video games." Since prod was contested earlier, I am bringing this to AFD Ray  Talk 19:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --  Ray  Talk 19:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  --  Ray  Talk 19:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  Ray  Talk 19:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: If the claims in the article are true, he easily passes WP:MUSICBIO #10 several times over. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 20:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete in fact, even if the claims are true none of them lead to passing musicbio. As it is, it's unrourced anyways.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Bali, and per the fact that #10 of MUSICBIO also includes the following: "But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article." Unit  Anode  21:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Which article? There are seven competing for this redir. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 21:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Any one of the 7 would work better than a full article. Unit  Anode  21:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: That clause is only applicable if the subject is only notable for one work: they should then probably be redirected to that work. If there are multiple notable works, redirecting to one of them does not make sense. It would be too arbitrary. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 21:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insufficient notability or sourcing to justify a BLP article. --DAJF (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject does not appear notable and reliable sources not available. --Stormbay (talk) 23:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per DAJF. "Insufficient notability or sourcing to justify a BLP article" is right.  JBsupreme (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 13:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above; unsrc, nn, &c. Jack Merridew 23:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.