Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totaljobs Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 09:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Totaljobs Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real coverage. Look-like promotional page. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm  (talk)  10:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. WP:Before wasn't conducted properly - very high penetration in the recruitment sector, well known brand all be it under the redirect Totaljobs, loads of refs in the article and easy to find on google. Szzuk (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as they are based on company announcements or run-of-the-mill business listings or rely on interviews/quotations or company produced information. Fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Perhaps can provide a coupld of references to support their !vote - I'm happy to change my !vote if I've missed something.  HighKing++ 19:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Notability is not an argument for deletion when the ATD are applicable. Unscintillating (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Wrong venue Given ATD (the owner has an article), if nominator wants to pursue a notability argument, the correct venue is a "merge-to" discussion on the talk page of the article.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   15:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete- the sourcing for this article is garbage, most of it comes from the company website.--Rusf10 (talk) 17:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.