Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totally

Totally was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Wikipedia is not a dictionary --fvw* 12:23, 2004 Nov 21 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article totally sucks. POV, dual content (which could be split into a dictdef and a nonnotable page), irrelevant... McKay 14:02, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is no dictionary, and I can't see what encyclopediac content that can be written about totally. Jeltz 15:41, 2004 Nov 21 (UTC)
 * I totally think that this article should be deleted. --Idont Havaname 20:19, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Incorrect dictdef followed by a website review. Both are inappropriate content. Geogre 20:29, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally. --Woggly 12:18, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Like, Oh my gosh. This article should be so Deleted. --Improv 21:25, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Totally and extremely delete this. [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:02, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I say delete. Cnwb 04:27, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Totally delete it! Bart133 19:08, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * The parts that aren't dictdef make me long for the parts that are. Delete with fire.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 06:16, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.