Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totally Spies! Totally Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Totally Spies!. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Totally Spies! Totally Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has zero coverage, no reviews and news. Only has the cover art and screen shots Timur9008 (talk) 20:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 3.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Totally Spies! where it is mentioned as a WP:ATD. The game fails WP:GNG because there is no multiple significant coverage in reliable sources. I found one in Jeuxvideo.com which certainly is not enough. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Totally Spies!. In addition to the Jeuxvideo review, I also found a short review on Igromania . One substantial review and one brief one is close to being enough to satisfy WP:GNG, but doesn't quite get there. Nothing in the article seems worth preserving in a merge, so redirect for now with the possibility of being spun off again iff more coverage can be found. Lowercaserho (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Totally Spies!, where it is already mentioned. I agree that the two sources found in this AFD are not sufficient to support an independent article, but certainly justify a redirect to the appropriate portion of the main Totally Spies! article.  Rorshacma (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.