Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tottenham Hale bus station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tottenham Hale station. We have only one keep that opposes the merge. Bookscale's weak keep mentions merge as a second choice. Since we have two straight merge arguments and two straight delete arguments, consensus not to keep as a standalone seems clear, and merging is the best-supported WP:ATD. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Tottenham Hale bus station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable bus station. This bus station only has four bus stands and is served by eight bus routes. There is nothing remarkable about this article or any notability to justify keeping this article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hardly a bus station, is more of an area outside the underground station where buses stop. Ajf773 (talk) 07:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It's been redeveloped considerably since the photo in the article was taken.Pontificalibus 09:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Tottenham Hale station as it's a significant combined transport interchange, but I haven't found in-depth coverage specifically of the bus station part.Pontificalibus 09:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems comparatively well-referenced for a bus station stub. Since Tottenham Hale station doesn't mention anything currently about buses I'm a bit dubious about the merge proposal. Mujinga (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It wasn't well referenced when I nominated it for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not very well referenced now either. There is not much coverage or notability for a bus station. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - seems to have some sources for notability (which a bus interchange would normally have very little). I'll err on the side of caution and keep. I do not support deletion - the merge to the station article is a viable alternative that should be considered first if consensus is not to keep the article. Bookscale (talk) 04:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Tottenham Hale station. Not worth a standalone article and is integral to the station.Charles (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.