Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touch Me and Say


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Touch Me and Say

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The book doesn't meet the notability criteria. New author published by a vanity press. Pichpich (talk) 17:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as completely failing WP:NB Nancy  talk  17:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * DELETE i think this is a bad article becos it does not have a source that is saying this is an important book. plus i have read a lot of book, and i have never heard of this book.--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable book. No evidence of reviews Vrivers (talk) 17:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This fails WP:BK.  M J 94 17:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-published - Pothi appear to be an Indian equivalent of lulu dot com (the bots don't like the version with a real dot in it...). Only ghits seem to be Wikipedia and Pothi. While I wish Mr Pathak good luck, I don't think the time is ripe for an article here. Someday, maybe... Peridon (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment the author of this article have something he would like to say..--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Bad edits r dumb. To make life easier, I'm copying it to here: "This is a recently published book, just 2 days back. It should be given a chance before deletion." Posted by Jatin229 on the talk page for the AfD. Jatin229, I'm sorry to say that this isn't a valid reason for keeping. Please look at WP:CRYSTAL - this is an encyclopaedia for recording things already of note, not things that might be some day. As I said above, some day... Peridon (talk) 18:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator and everyone else. Maybe a WP:SNOW candidate. -Phoenixrod (talk) 20:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've got me boots on... Peridon (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for books. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  21:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.