Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toufique Imrose Khalidi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Toufique Imrose Khalidi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. Much of the sources are single mentions or are from Bdnews24.com (an online news site), of which he is the editor. Sources one and two are quotations from him in news articles. Source three is an article written by him. Source four notes he was a panellist at an event. Source five says he was a panellist at an event. Source Six is a quotation. Source seven is his profile on his news site. Source eight is significant coverage in an independent source. Source nine is an article written by him on his news site. Source ten is 404. Source 11 is his site. Source 12 is his site. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism,  and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. From the info given from the nominator, I say delete since the person who added those sources couldn't find anything better. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 08:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Strong keep Much coverage of the scandal such as, perhaps not meeting JOURNALIST but is at GNG with the media coverage about his financial doings, talk of corruption and such. Oaktree b (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with nom and did some cleanup to remove what was only sourced to Bdnews24.com. Searching for sources, outside of the case against him, sources are from his news site, brief mentions or his statements.   However, I don't think the coverage about his legal issues meets GNG as the sources do not state much about him.  Happy to reconsider, though. S0091 (talk) 19:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.