Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tough Love: Controversial Methods for the Rehabilitation of Problem Children


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete, blanked by author. -- Kjkolb 11:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Tough Love: Controversial Methods for the Rehabilitation of Problem Children
POV Essay

This is an essay with an agenda rather than encyclopedia article. There's no way it's ever going to come up in a search, particularly with such a bizarre title. I'd have suggested a merge except that a similar article already exists at World_Wide_Association_of_Specialty_Programs_and_Schools and has the same problems. I also suspect that there's copyright violation going on since the article self-referentially uses the phrase "this paper" twice. --IslaySolomon 02:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, nom's reason is good enough. Also a little spammy.Bjones 02:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TheRingess 02:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Viridae Talk 02:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOT. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all AdamBiswanger1 02:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I thought it was going to be about a book from the title, but rather, it is the book. Ace of Sevens 02:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all reasons here, articles like this trash our reputation. SM247 My Talk
 * Speedy Delete, as A6 since the page does nothing but attack the subject ('WAASPS') and the author's name is "Wwasp swatter". Or G7 since the author blanked the page a minute ago. If not, obvious delete for the above stated reasons. Kuru  talk  05:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, as per CSD G7 (and CSD A1) - pages that are blanked by their author can be assumed to be a request for deletion by the author.-- blue  520  09:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.