Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour companies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Tour companies

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article's concept is overly broad; individual articles could be made (and do exist) that cover individual tour companies but nothing notable ties them together, which is what this article is trying to do. The article basically consists of the term's definition, a guide for doing business with them, and the entire article is ridden with spam and POV assertions. I can't see how this can be improved upon without merging into the scope of the Travel agency article. Themfromspace (talk) 01:39, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep a decent article could be written on this topic, but this isn't it. JJL (talk) 02:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless significant changes are made to the article and with absolutely no prejudice to recreating a neutral, verifiable article based on information from reliable sources. I am pretty sure that an article on the concept of tour companies could be written but the current article is written in such a spammy and promotional way that I do not think that anything would remain if the article was rewritten based on Wikipedia's quality and content guidelines. Guest9999 (talk) 06:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  20:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing of merit. Someone might in the future create an article of value with this title, but I suspect not. Notable material on this topic probably belongs elsewhere. Bongomatic (talk) 07:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.