Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour of Duty (Judge Dredd story)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Judge Dredd. ✗ plicit  11:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Tour of Duty (Judge Dredd story)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability 2 years ago, still no reception section, just a plot summary and publication history. That said, while some Dredd story arcs have ended up as redirects to Judge_Dredd, others made it through AfDs in the past, so let's discuss. Can we find sources to rescue this, or should it be redirected? My BEFORE isn't showing much. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to whichever article is apropriate; unfortunately, this particular part doesn't seem do be eligible for an article on its own. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: more to review at Template:Judge Dredd... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Judge Dredd as suggested by the nomination. I was unable to find any kind of real coverage or reviews in reliable sources, just in a few fan sites and blogs. The suggested target probably needs to have a good cleanup itself (its completely unsourced, with nothing actually supporting which listed stores are in fact, "major" storylines"), but that's a different issue and for now, would be the best target for the nominated article. Rorshacma (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.