Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour of Nilgiris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Tour of Nilgiris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm nominating this article for deletion as it basically appears to be an advertisement and non-notable) Rehnn83 Talk 12:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  20:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I’ve seen non–non-notable articles deleted before a discussion could even start or the editor given any chance, all done by new editors who were well-intentioned but did not know what “looks like an advertisement” means. I would demand evidence of non-notability, from locals, and evidence that the editor has been contacted and given reasonable time to defend themself.—Al12si (talk) 20:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Most of the information on the page is irrelevant. The article details the tour but most of what is being discussed is unnecessary and excessive. Also, the page is flooded with promotional claims (reading like an advertisement as stated above). Finally, the page needs some reliable sources to back it up. Meatsgains (talk) 07:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep Clearly passes WP:GNG, despite current unreferenced nature of article. Sources available include multiple cycling websites as well as the largest newspaper in southern India. Nominator may have missed some steps in WP:BEFORE. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 12:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - there may have been a WP:HEY done on it by someone who wasn't logged in, but as it stands now it looks notable to me. Neonchameleon (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Looks like it is here to stay. Notable enough. --regentspark (comment) 14:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.