Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Comilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Comilla. The Bushranger One ping only 18:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Tourism in Comilla

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an unsourced article which was created late November 2015 by who has a history of problematic and disruptive editing. This particular article comprises of a list of 33 different "Places to see in Comilla", and no other context. While the concept of tourism in Comilla may be a subject worthy of note, this article offers nothing in the way of encyclopedic value. Recommending deletion without prejudice against a proper article being created at a later date. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The article creator has not edited since 2 December, possibly having changed username to another who is being disruptive. There are some very good images on the article, which could be moved to the tourist section of the Comilla article, then redirect the article to Comilla. Richard Harvey (talk) 01:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Comilla, as it's a plausible search expression. The topic should be developed in the section Comilla, and only split into its own article after it is well constructed enough to stand on its own, and when it becomes too big for Comilla. I would recommend merge, except that there's no sourced text to preserve (the photos are on commons, so they'll remain available for any article that can use them). Worldbruce (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.