Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Punjab, India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Tourism in Punjab, India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article contains 17KB of unsourced content, which is largely a travel guide of sorts. While tourism in Punjab, India may be a topic which can be documented in an encyclopedic fashion, I was unable to find a salvageable diff from the page history of this particular article. I am of the mind that this should be deleted with no objection to a new article created in its place, based upon reliable, published sources. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Or we can rename it to List of tourist attractions in Punjab, India and keep a plain list of blue-links. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * We have got Category:Visitor attractions in Punjab, India. Salvageable content (if any) from this article can be transwikied to Punjab (India). This topic is a valid (about Tourism as an industry in Punjab), but it's probably best to start over. utcursch &#124; talk 18:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Honestly I can imagine this article existing more naturally as a category rather than a list article. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm uncertain whether articles of this nature are ever going to be encyclopedic, because the nature of the topic means that is has a permanent tendency to sound like a travel guide. Even if it is a worthwhile topic, however, WP:TNT applies. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.