Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourist attractions of Beijing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep and rename to List of landmarks in Beijing. T. Canens (talk) 04:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Tourist attractions of Beijing
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a directory or a guide for tourists and article has no sources, to demonstrate that this topic is notable. It could be converted into a category. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  15:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, borderline speedy delete for CSD G11. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Jeremy McClean (Talk) 22:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Rename to List of landmarks in Beijing and scrub clean. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The topic may easily be developed in an encyclopaedic way by reference to sources such as The making and selling of post-Mao Beijing. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Lists and categories go hand-in-hand per WP:CLN. This list however should be renamed per the anon IP (but not scrubbed clean).  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Inherently subjective topic. Wikipedia is not a Tourist Information Guide. —Carrite, Sept. 26, 2010.
 * Keep and Rename to List of landmarks in Beijing per the IP editor above. This is actually fine as a navigational aid list, which provides users with a set of blue-links. —Carrite, Sept. 26, 2010.
 * Keep and rename per Carrite— Chris! c / t 20:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Reasonable navigational list to points of interest. Ambivalent about renaming, I think the current and proposed names are both fine. Jclemens (talk) 01:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.