Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tournament of Knights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Tournament of Knights

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Exactly zilch suggestion of notability. Article has been tagged for lacking notability for months short of a decade (and tagged in general since December 2007). Prodded on the 13th, deprodded on the 14th, but the kind of deprod where it's suggested to go to AfD rather than confidently keep. WP:BEFORE turned up two stores selling the physical game and a Pinterest post. Creator appears to be a WP:SPA promoting the game. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete To appease another editor's concern for my fingers I am condensing this !vote into a shorter version of my findings on this WP:BEFORE. No blah, blah, in-depth, blah, blah, significant, blah, blah, reliable, blah, blah, multiple sources. WP:NOT WP:N -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 19:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete blatantly spam for a non-notable game. I can’t believe this article has survived for almost 15 years. Dronebogus (talk) 20:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - this game was obviously invented by the article's creator, and I can find no coverage at all in any sources that aren't game resellers. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 14:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails in passing WP:GNG. Sliekid (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.