Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tova Laiter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, it looks like notability has not been established at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Tova Laiter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish that she is WP:NOTABLE, rather than just has worked on notable films. This has been tagged for nearly six years for its notability - I'm not convinced she's notable, but a discussion should resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 20:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment According to EBSCO, Hollywood Reporter did a profile on her, but I don't have access. Also a bit of coverage in LA Times. This article is rather promotional (though more in a bland CV-like way than a "she's wonderful!" way), but I'd like to see someone doing a newspaper search in commercial databases before deletion. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfortunately, the Hollywood Reporter piece isn't a profile but just really contact information for when she was a production executive. The LA Times articles only briefly mention her as a producer involved with the real subjects of the articles.  There is a lack of substantive coverage concerning this subject. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.