Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Towelroot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted per G12. —Swpbtalk 17:24, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Towelroot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Old enough that if it was gonna make the news, it would have, but recent enough that you'd expect it to be all over the internet. And yet, it isn't, and I see minimal coverage of it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - Found this, this, this and this. Oddly, as you say, its not all over the internet. That said, some notable coverage there (International Business Times for example).  JT dale Talk ~ 12:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Text and sources don't even assert, much less establish, notability, and the text is unredeemably POV. —Swpbtalk 15:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G12. Bald copyvio slapped together from two sources (in tag). Dea  db  eef  21:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.