Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Towerlands Tram Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Towerlands Tram Road

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable;
 * Only Google search hits plagiarize Wikipedia (irvinescotland.info/*).
 * DuckDuckGo is no better.
 * Google Books search turns up at most two possible secondary sources: Wham, The Lost Railway Lines of Ayrshire and Stansfield, Ayrshire & Renfrewshire's Lost Railways. Paterson, History of the Counties of Ayr and Wigton, pts. 1-2: Kyle does not seem to include anything relevant.
 * Google News Archive turns up a number of primary sources: articles in the Glasgow Herald.
 * No Google Scholar hits.
 * Current content is exclusively original research. Bernanke&#39;s Crossbow (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Bernanke&#39;s Crossbow (talk) 06:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bernanke&#39;s Crossbow (talk) 06:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Bernanke&#39;s Crossbow (talk) 06:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Use of published maps - is this classes as original research? Rosser Gruffydd 13:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Whey you attribute claims to maps that are not explicitly depicted on them, that is absolutely original research. Instances of this are omnipresent in the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete What we have is so utterly full of OR and speculation that it's hardly clear what is fact and what is the author's personal thoughts and theories. Even if there were a notable topic here this would merit a healthy dose of TNT. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.