Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyin Anthony Amuzu (TA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Toyin Anthony Amuzu (TA)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional BLP of a subject who does not pass WP:NPOL or have in depth coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. Mccapra (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NPOL.  Princess of Ara  11:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — I can’t see NPOL met. A google search shows nothing cogent, a BASIC argument cannot even be made. Celestina007 (talk) 13:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is written much more like a résumé than a proper encyclopedia article, says nothing about him that would get him over WP:NPOL, and does not get over WP:GNG as the "references" are not coverage about him, but pieces quoting and/or written by him as statements of his opinions on things — which is not the kind of sourcing that makes a person notable. Bearcat (talk) 00:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG, and a record of losing one election and qualifying for but not contesting a second one isn't nearly enough to meet WP:NPOL. Apart from that, the article is basically a puff piece written with no pretense to a neutral point of view. PohranicniStraze (talk) 03:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.