Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota L engine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep - nomination withdrawn. PhilKnight (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Toyota L engine

 * – (View AfD)

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep because the article is one of many about different engines and automotive components, as well as one of numerous articles in Category:Toyota engines. (If those are notable enough, than this should be too. Otherwise, they should all be nominated for deletion, and I'm not expecting that to happen.) The addition of sources would obviously be an improvement, however. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm having a bit of trouble finding an online source for it, but it should be obvious enough that Toyota engines are subject to substantial popular press (magazines, typically) and that for an otherwise good article about a notable subject that's easy enough to verify exists the flawless establishment of notability shouldn't be a prerequisite. Wily D 15:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google Books search for the article title, one of the obvious things to do before nomination for deletion, shows two whole books on the subject right in front of your eyes. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm having a bit of trouble finding an online source for it, but it should be obvious enough that Toyota engines are subject to substantial popular press (magazines, typically) and that for an otherwise good article about a notable subject that's easy enough to verify exists the flawless establishment of notability shouldn't be a prerequisite. Wily D 15:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google Books search for the article title, one of the obvious things to do before nomination for deletion, shows two whole books on the subject right in front of your eyes. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Well I did say 'independent of the subject', and they are published by Toyota, however, at least that's better than nothing. I'll withdraw the nom. PhilKnight (talk) 17:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.