Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Zych


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Tracy Zych

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essentially every reference either in the article or listed on the talk page is a mere mention--sometimes just a labelled illustration, sometimes a paragraph, usually more about the celebrity carrying the designer's bag than about the designer. A few are pr-interviews. I'm aware there is less distinction between PR and genuine coverage in fashion than in most fields of life, but this is an example of particularly weak sourcing. The article is furthermore gushy prose. Again, now unusual, but exceptionally so at least in WP: "As popularity and success grew"  "a small yet elaborate collection which gained instant recognition, "  DGG ( talk ) 03:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per User:DGG. Poor coverage in available sources; which is unable to satisfy WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.