Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trad rock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is that while there may possibly be a good article on this topic, this isn't it. Stifle (talk) 11:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Trad rock

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete per WP:NOR. YeaH, Ino (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The term itself is definitely not an OR. A simple Google search yields multiple legitimate sites using this term. You can also find articles such as this using the term. What the article needs is an encyclopedic treatment and not deletion. LeaveSleaves talk 16:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete if you get rid of the unreferenced parts, you'll have nothing left. I would, however, be willing to support recreation if an expert on the subject can get together a nicely well put together article on the topic. Tavix (talk) 02:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Seems to me the British end of this movement is already covered in Brit pop, with the US bands in Grunge. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: original research. JamesBurns (talk) 05:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, the current article is quite poor, but as shown, this is a real term and a decent article could be written about it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.