Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trade-peror's Unified Economic Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 06:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Trade-peror's Unified Economic Theory
Strategy guide for the computer game Civilization. Five google hits, all on Civilization fan forums. Vary | Talk 22:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. Original research, unverifiable from reliable sources, indiscriminate information, vanity.  Gamecruft and forumcruft combined to create one massive lump of onanistic unimportance. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 23:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I am a new user, and I am very sorry to have offended the Wikipedia community. The only reason I have listed this body of suggestions on Wikipedia is because it has come up in a number of discussions on various forums discussing the improvement of Sid Meier's Civilization. I thought Wikipedia could serve as a standard reference. Since that is apparently not acceptable, feel free to delete if you wish. I will be more careful in the future. Trade-peror 00:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Trade-peror
 * Comment Hi, Trade-peror. Please don't feel you've offended anyone; it's just that this isn't the sort of article we usually keep here at Wikipedia.  I don't do a whole lot over there, so I don't know for sure if this would work, but Wikibooks has a near-empty page on Civilization. .  Maybe they'd be able to use your content over there?  At any rate, I'd go ahead and copy the article right now, before the page is deleted, if you haven't already.  I see you put a lot of work into wikifying it.  -- Vary | Talk 01:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.