Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TradeBeam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

TradeBeam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Spam for non-notable tech company. Only references and GNews hits are press releases. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  02:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unambiguous advertising: a Global Trade Management software and services company. Software sold via the on-demand SaaS model provides import and export compliance, inventory management, shipment tracking, supply chain event management, and global trade finance solutions. Yet another back office software business advertising on Wikipedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious advert. LibStar (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisting comment. The 2 delete !votes appear to be based on the article being a speedy deletion candidate (CSD G11). Therefore I evaluated this the same way I would if I came across it while patrolling CAT:CSD and I decided that I would decline a G11 for this article. Therefore, I think this discussion needs to shift toward WP:CORP and the nominator's claim that all the gnews hits are "press releases". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Further comment. The first AFD was one of my world famous NACs. In it the !voters were satisfied that the coverage was sufficient. (ie not "press releases") Ironically, the version first AFDd looked a little more spammy then the current revision. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Advert KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 07:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.