Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trade (gallery)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Trade (gallery)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article created by an SPA, that to my opinion, is an advert for the gallery. It is freshly relaunched (see source 6). Without the namedropping (two-third of the article) you are left with an article sourced by primary sources, trivial mentions and non-independent sources. Night of the Big Wind talk  16:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - the article in The Independent is far more than a trivial mention: it is a serious recommendation in a major national newspaper. The judicious use of 3rd-party primary sources can establish facts. Indeed even the careful use of first-party primary sources for information is permitted as long as it's clear what they are. Let's see what else people can find. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It is truly a trivial mentioning, because the section is about the building "1 Thoresby Street". The gallery is only referred to as one of the users of the building. Night of the Big Wind  talk  14:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The article is actually headed "The world's best secret art galleries" and the building is described as home to some of them, including this one. The article is about galleries, not about buildings. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 19:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  00:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.