Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trade Union Centre of Curaçao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 02:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Trade Union Centre of Curaçao

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet the WP:NORG, with the only reference being a listing. Speedy was declined so bringing this to AfD. Let&#39;srun (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Netherlands. Let&#39;srun (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. NORG is not measured by references but by sources. Nominators need to do a BEFORE, not a review of references in the article. That said, article is extremely brief and provides virtually no context. Maybe can be redirected somewhere? Otherwise delete without prejudice. gidonb (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I should clarify that a BEFORE didn't come up with any sources to lend the subject meeting any notability guideline. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: What is the target article being proposed for a possible redirect? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The organization is best known as Sentral di Sindikatonan di Korsou, in Papiamento language. I added two references. It is one of the trade union associations of Curacao and represents ten local trade unions. The article requires more work. I hope to be able to find the time. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Ruud provided just enough context for keep. My previous delete was without prejudice against keeping if more context is provided, so this change is totally in line with my previous opinion. gidonb (talk) 23:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 00:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.