Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tradeinfo365


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 02:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Tradeinfo365

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The prod was removed by the creator. I found no notability for this company. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  00:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete - would almost qualify for G11 speedy deletion as it's basically just an advert. I found some coverage in industry blogs but nothing I think we would consider reliable sources for meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. It may well be a case of WP:TOOSOON but an ad like this, created by an editor with an obvious conflict of interest, shouldn't be kept. Stalwart 111  01:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Most of the article content was a straight copy of a page from the firm's website; though they had almost certainly done the copy-paste themselves, without formal permission it is a WP:COPYVIO so I have deleted it. AllyD (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:RS evidence of notability found (on Google, Highbeam, Questia). AllyD (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.