Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trademark Classes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Merge into Nice (WIPO). PhilKnight (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Trademark Classes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:RS. Any important information can be merged into Trademark.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * We seem to have another article on this at Nice (WIPO). No opinion on deletion. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Suggest merger into the article found by Andrew Lenahan, good catch. I think it's been reworded enough to not be a true copyright violation, especially since legal standards are being discussed, and language for them tends to resist paraphrase.  The information here would make that stub a lot more informative. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note also International (Nice) Classification of Goods and Services, which has a more accessible title and a list of signatories, but little info on the actual classes. I think that Nice is the most important grouping of classes, but we would want to make sure there aren't any significant ones outside the WIPO agreement and note them. I think that in its present form there's nothing worth keeping as a separate article, so merge to Trademark for now. --Dhartung | Talk 22:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into Nice (WIPO).  Gtstricky Talk or C 20:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.