Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional Brick Factory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Traditional Brick Factory

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Total mess of an article created on the 29th. Most information is duplicated from Brickworks and brick, leaving an incoherent mess of redundancy. Contains large amounts of copyrighted material. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:59, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete is the remedy for this very badly done article. There might be some content which could be added to the brickworks article, but care must be taken not to use copyrighted text. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge  To Brickworks Has some good material on an enclyclopedic topic. North8000 (talk) 18:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with the copyright concerns. Anything salvageable has issues. Harry the Dog WOOF  20:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - presumably the copyright concerns are about copying text from other Wikipedia articles? *If* any of the new information can be attributed to a reliable source, I will argue it should be merged with an existing article. But at the moment there is probably too much duplicated and/or unattributed info to justify the article's survival. Sionk (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Note I think there are copyvio issues with some of the images, and some of the text seems to have been taken from the linked articles. Harry the Dog WOOF  08:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.