Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, edit the article. Tim Vickers (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

As far as I know, we (those who have contributed to the creation of the wiki page Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine) have 5 days to debate the deletion of this page.

I was the main writer and creator of this article. I simply want to delete because I feel we can all write and create a better article for this subject. It will be simpler to delete the page and then start over, rather than try to edit, change and add to the present article.

I feel this subject is important, relevant and compelling, and it deserves a better article than the present one on wiki.

To the other 2 persons who have edited it and to all who are interested, please feel free to add your comments to this discussion.

As far as I know, only a Wiki administrator can actually delete an article.

Thank you.

relax777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Relax777 (talk • contribs) 2009/06/01 03:08:37
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. No argument for deleting this text is presented in the nomination.  The fact that an originating author is unsatisfied with his effort is not grounds for deleting an article; editing and changing articles is at the heart of what happens here, and there is no deadline.  The subject itself seems fairly obviously worthy of coverage. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject seems notable, and I think the nominator is being overly harsh on themselves - the article, while not perfect, is pretty good. Keep, and improve. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 16:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Disclosure: I've edited Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine since, and as a result of, !voting here. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 17:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment that doesn't sound like a deletion rationale. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 07:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - There is no reason why a major rewrite cannot be done while leaving the current article in place. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.