Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional knowledge about landscape ecology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Traditional knowledge about landscape ecology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Earlier prod was removed. The page reads like an essay and is based on one unpublished source. Vilates WP:V and WP:NOT. Problems persist for over a year now, so enough time has been given to fix it. Fram (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails requirements for style and references. - Mgm|(talk) 11:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Violates WP:OR


 * Delete OR homework-ish personal essay Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 13:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, weakly, and regretfully. An article on folk conservation practices might be valuable, and the original contributor obviously knows something about them.  But this article is referenced to his own unpublished thesis, which in turn relies heavily on his own field work in India, and as such it's original research of the sort we discourage.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * We do have an article on ethnoecology. Not sure that the instant title is well suited for a redirect, though. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as violation of WP:NOR. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 10:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.