Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traeonna Wagener


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, per WP:SNOW J.delanoy gabs adds  04:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Traeonna Wagener

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable occult author, only one minor book published. Note: I declined to speedy deleted it because notability is asserted but I think it can't be established by the sources or a Google search.  So Why  22:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Related items to also delete:


 * Comment: Amazon has subject listed as a contributor to the book. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 22:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete I'm going to restrain myself to simply saying that this is obviously simply vanityspamcruft. Obviously non-notable, no sources, has contributed to one book at best. Delete with extreme prejudice. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment And in the interests of honesty, I looked for sources via Google and found squat, but hadn't looked at the page history. It surprises me not a jot that the page was created by a user named "Traeonna". Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and add to this nomination redirects and  and copyrighted  as well.  I also strongly suspect that  is the subject of the article.    — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 00:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Nothing that meets wp:creative notability. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to lack notability. The probable self-promotion is an aggravating factor. Jehochman Talk 00:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this autobiographical spam and add Traeonna to the list of redirects to be deleted as well. — Athaenara  ✉  00:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't like it. Oh, and fails WP:BK mainly by lacking notability and #A1 (indiscriminate collection of information).  Digital Ninja WTF 03:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. A quick googling of the publisher name leads me to suspect that the book was self-published. And add to the list of deletables too. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 04:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * delete There is a part of me that would like to keep since I think I've heard of her and thus she must be notable. But really doesn't meet WP:BIO at this time. JoshuaZ (talk) 04:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.