Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traffic congestion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and expand. One more lane, bro. One more lane is gonna fix this, just watch! (non-admin closure) &#128156; melecie   talk  - 00:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Traffic congestion


Even when the freeway was widened, congestion kept coming back! Congestion-solving is very elusive (or is it). -- AlphaBeta135 talk 00:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and expand Stroad instead. One more lane will fix this! &#128156; melecie   talk  - 03:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * One more lane! Just one more lane. I swear we're going to fix traffic. SWinxy (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete induced demand instead per WP:HOAX. They're not building freeways in Tucson and it's still growing, and the same is true for Atlanta's northern suburbs. On the other hand, Binghamton has I-81, I-86, and I-88, but it's declining like the rest of the Rust Belt. HotdogPi 12:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.